If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A lower court may not rule against a binding precedent, whether or not it feels that it is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The ruling from the first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts right up until or Until both new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will consider care of all of the aspects of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Just some years ago, searching for case precedent was a complicated and time consuming undertaking, necessitating people today to search through print copies of case law, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case law search alternatives, and plenty of sources offer free access to case law.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a chance of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all acting in their Employment with DCFS.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons click here owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its different pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and not abduct. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more